1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhannawk [14.2K]
3 years ago
15

6. What did Wilson predict would happen when the US did not join the League of Nations?

History
1 answer:
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

“I can predict with absolute certainty that within another generation there will be another world war if the nations of the world do not concert the method by which to prevent it.”

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who were the big three who made most of the decisions about how world war 2 would end and what happened afterword
MArishka [77]

Answer: Winston CHurchill, Stalin, Roosevelt

Explanation:

The big 3 met many times and discussed the progression of the countries post-ww2. They sacrificed "freedom for stability" although the tensions between churchill and roosevelt somewhat ensured the ensuing of a later cold war

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements are supported by the information in the text?
Aleksandr [31]

The statements that agrees with the text concerning the use of the atomic bomb as we have in the excerpt are:

  • The scientists felt that saving American lives had to take priority in the war.
  • Most of the scientists believed using the bomb to force a surrender was the only option.

<h3>Why was there a debate on the use of the atomic bomb?</h3>

This was due to the fact that the scientists understood the impact that the bomb could have on the environment and the lives around.

The bomb was used against the Japanese in Hiroshima during the second world war. It was a way of getting the Japanese to surrender.

Read more on the atomic bomb here: brainly.com/question/12757291

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
The supreme court rejected the constitutionality of plessy's "separate but equal" in
Aleks04 [339]
Plessy<span> v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) was a landmark </span>constitutional<span> law case of the US </span>Supreme Court<span> decided in 1896. It upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "</span>separate but equal<span>"</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What might have happened if America lost the war to Britain?
Shtirlitz [24]
We would all be punished severely
7 0
4 years ago
State directly north of lllionis
horrorfan [7]

Wisconsin is the state

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does this journal entry describe?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the oldest Aegean civilization?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the election of 1992 significant?
    13·1 answer
  • What are the components of a technological system
    10·1 answer
  • The second front was important because
    7·1 answer
  • What factors led to the Chinese exclusive act? (Describe two or more)
    6·1 answer
  • NEED HELP URGENTLY PLEASE
    10·1 answer
  • Is Rome located northeast or southwest of Jerusalem?
    12·1 answer
  • What happened in the andijan massacre in 2005?
    8·1 answer
  • What do you know about the role of the court in your own words
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!