All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Simple practical influenced bu christian symbols open
Big stick ideology, big stick diplomacy, or big stick policy<span> refers to U.S. President </span>Theodore Roosevelt<span>'s </span>foreign policy<span>: "speak softly, and carry a big stick."</span>
<span>The authorization was issued by president Roosevelt with the Executive Order 9066</span>
<span>The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. It established a weak central government that mostly, but not entirely, prevented the individual states from conducting their own foreign diplomacy.</span>
