1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adelina 88 [10]
2 years ago
15

Select the piece of evidence that best supports this claim.

English
2 answers:
vekshin12 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Electric cars require much less maintenance than gas-powered cars (choice 1)

Explanation:

The claim "Electric cars are superior to gas-powered cars" needs to be supported with a piece of evidence that shows why electric cars are better than gas-powered cars. Between the two options, the first one is the only one that is in support of electric cars, because it talks about how they require less maintenance than gas-powered cars. However, the second option points out a flaw of electric cars, which is their range as compared to gas-powered cars. Therefore, the first option is correct.

pishuonlain [190]2 years ago
5 0
<h3>Answer: Choice A</h3>

Explanation:

Choice A lists a positive aspect about electric cars not needing as much maintenance compared to gas powered cars. This could be perhaps due to the less moving parts. Though I think as time goes on, electric cars may wear out at around the same rate compared to gas powered cars. I'm not too familiar with the tech, so I would get a second opinion.

Choice B mentions how electric cars can't drive very far, and need frequent recharges. This is a negative statement that would make someone not an electric car and would likely make them think that gas powered cars are better. So this means we can rule out choice B.

You might be interested in
Definitely marking Brainliest too!
blsea [12.9K]

Living Forever Is Ǟ Wonderful Thing

What is better? Getting up every day being greeted by your beautiful face or a deceiving, horrendous, lifeless face? Being flexible is a better healthier, new way of living. I mean what could you really do if you were stiff and couldn't get up? Nothing right? Do you get the gist of it now? Everyone wants to have a much easier life, a life which feels like its worth living.

As some may feel, the world revolves around them. Why is everything always about us and not others?? The tip of our fingers, our smooth, rough fingers, control the world. Beauty is everything for us especially for females, not trying to be sexist or anything. In average women waste more money on unnecessary things. Also, more time is unfairly wasted on what they look the outside, when they clearly know they aren't as pretty inside. Not saying that males don't do the same but it is a bit different. It is more about their body and not how they legitimately look on the outside. Enough about beauty and body types, but I hope you get my idea. What I am trying to portray here is that; the idea of having to stay beauty is only temporary...unless if you were to live forever.  

Now. After this long and boring intro, you must be wondering why living forever is such a good thing. We don't have enough resources in this world for us to live that long. The number of resources we are required has to be stored somewhere so that we are able to use it later on for much greater needs. Also, we would most likely all end up dying from starvation or dehydration and over-cultivating our population. Well as we might have guessed already, us humans are advanced enough to figure out these problems about food shortage. There are many ways in which we may be able to preserve these animals so that we are able to consume food without them running out.

Vegetarians, vegans, and other semi-vegetarianism categories were estimated in 2018 to be about 25% of the world population. This shows that just like these people we should be able to live off by eating vegetables and not as much meat. Even though we get a greater about of calories and energy form meat, we could still adjust with plants and vegetables.  

There are many benefits to living forever. The biggest benefit is education. If we were able to live a long life, education would be nothing. You would get many chances in your life to get smarter and more intelligent. We would live long enough to realise our mistakes and resolve ourselves. Not saying that education isn't as important now but just stating the fact that then you would have a longer time to figure the mistakes you have done.

There are some benefits to do with the law. the world's top 5 execution in 2018 were in; China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam and the USA. 29 of the 50 states in the USA allow capital punishment. California, which is the most populous state, has the largest death row with over 700 inmates. Why is this significant to "Living Forever"? Well if immortality was real, then the government would have a greater advantage for jailing time, how long it would be for a life sentence.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope you get a good grade. I got a distinction for this speech, please make sure to read over this speech and get your peers in class to ask the right questions if it's like that, that is.

8 0
3 years ago
In Twain's "The Californian's
Bad White [126]

In Twain's "The Californian's Tale" the portion that characterizes the narrator is " regrets for their wasted lives, and longings to be out of the struggle and done with it all." (Option A)

<h3>What is characterization?</h3>

Characterization is the process of creating the personality and depth of characters.

Characters are essential to the plot of a story because they help to drive it forward.

Learn more about characterization at:
brainly.com/question/898716
#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Read It!
Delicious77 [7]
Answer: C

Explanation:
5 0
3 years ago
"If I am in the country with you
Aleks04 [339]
The correct answer is d
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of logical fallacy is an error in how the writer characterizes the relationship between two events? appeal to authorit
Vinil7 [7]
<span>false cause

When a speaker or writer tries to  connect two things that don't directly  have an effect on each other as having an effect on each other, it is false cause. Saying that one thing directly causes another when there is no proof or factual evidence to back that up weakens an argument significantly. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the following excerpt from F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, in which Daisy describes her point of view:
    7·1 answer
  • Which vocabulary word best completes the following sentence? The excitement of the revolution ____ people, and they demanded fre
    11·2 answers
  • What is the overall theme the dolls house
    6·1 answer
  • What is the purpose the article fancy feathered flamingos by guy
    14·1 answer
  • Obsidian,(underlined: which was used by early man to make arrowheads), is a naturally occurring glass.
    5·2 answers
  • Identify a word that shows a pathos example in the following. Please give a reason why.
    7·1 answer
  • What a sheep are grazing in the field​
    7·1 answer
  • In "Rules of the Game," what motivates Mrs. Jong to grant privileges to Waverly that her brothers do not
    15·1 answer
  • Pls help
    5·1 answer
  • What is the subject of this poem? the value of precious metals the colors of nature the potential within people the inevitabilit
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!