Answer:
- Due to
- Since
- Consequently
- Consequently
- due to
- Consequently
- Since
Everything is correct except the last one.
First, it's associated sometimes with highly contentious theories, such as Holocaust denial. Recall the public furor in response to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 2007 speech at Columbia University, when he stated that the Holocaust didn't happen. Historians emphasize that people who deny the events of the Holocaust during World War II aren't practicing revisionist history but rather negationism. Another revisionism-related scandal occurred recently in Japan, also concerning World War II. The general of the Japanese air force authored an essay asserting that Japan was bullied into Pearl Harbor by the United States and only engaged in combat as a defensive measure. This brings up the issue of credibility that has marred the field of historical revisionism. The public tends to view revisionist theories of well-known historical incidents tied closely to its own lineage with more skepticism than those regarding more obscure events.
In the end, only a small quantity of revisionists histories are eventually accepted as fact.
Answer:
B. Arundel High School is on Annapolis Road in Gambrills, Maryland; it is home to the Wildcats.
Explanation:
Choice A lacks a<em> verb </em>to connect the thought and <em>"high school" </em>is not capitalized here. It should be capitalized because its name is part of a school.
Choice C<em> didn't use the semicolon properly. </em>This punctuation is used when you are trying <em>to separate two independent clauses</em>. The second clause, <em>"home to the Wildcats"</em> is a dependent clause.
Choice D didn't use the conjunction "and" properly. When you're connecting two independent clauses with a conjunction, you should put a "comma" before the conjunction.
<u>It is only Choice B that is grammatically correct</u>. It made use of the semicolon properly. It connected two statements in order to prevent pause and to make it readable.
Answer: The weakest point would be the first one that states: teaching with video games would be much better than teaching the traditional way.
Explanation:
The first one is an opinion and therefore does not provide any solid proof.
The second gives a reason, the third a statement, and the fourth suggest that since students are playing video games outside, students might start studying out of school.
