In
education, during Napoleon’s reign, he established the primary, secondary education
and lycees. He also allowed girls to go to school but separated the learning
process between boys and girls. Followed that education was purposefully in the
knowledge of knowing military protocols –in which also had various aspects to
deliver.
In
government, Napoleon became the emperor of France. There are two National
Assemblies, the candidates were voted and elected by the people. Hence,
thereafter, Napoleon would select and pick the contestants to be nominated at
this second phase. Laws, rules and decrees were then decided by the Assemblies.
<span>The direct influence of the enlightenment in America was</span> confined mainly to some skilled artisans and elite planters and merchants.
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
The main difference is that under communism, most property and economic resources are owned and controlled by the state (rather than individual citizens); under socialism, all citizens share equally in economic resources as allocated by a democratically-elected government.
Explanation:
Answer:
...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”
Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...
Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).
