There are a number of differences between World War I and II.
The primary is the origin story.
With World War I, the war broke out because of a complex web of diplomatic and military alliances that were summoned after the assassination of the Arch Duke of the Austro Hungarian Empire. It was further exacerbated by a culture of nationalism throughout Europe.
World War II broke out because of the belligerence of the German Third Reich and its allies.
The Democratic Party, although it had existed from the time of the framing as the Democratic-Republican party, headed more or less by Thomas Jefferson, was reformulated by Andrew Jackson in the 1820s, and its core principles were a deep distrust of cultural or fiscal aristocracy, central government, fiat money and large banks. It was strongly populist, strongly in favor of exploitation of the Western frontier and natural resources generally, and generally strongly racist, with an abiding contempt for Native Americans, foreign immigrants, and blacks. The Republican Party was founded from the ashes of the Whigs in the 1850s, and its first important leader was Abraham Lincoln, elected President in 1860s. Its core principles were a "frontiersman" self-reliance, ecological conservationism, support for small business, a neutrality towards large business and government, and a strong support for the civil rights of immigrants, Native Americans, and blacks. Of course, over time each party has evolved considerably.
The answer would be military rule! The reason why is because a new group of military leaders named " Kamakura Shogunate" were the ones that were now in charge of ruling the country.
Have a nice day! :)
They sided with Britain and claimed it owned the land made up by the Ohio County.
