Abdhajajsjehehsusuwh nini are good djalma he ysiwjegdve
Https://us-static.z-dn.net/files/da0/898a932883d3d078dd059fa2a97c67a7.jpeg
Answer:
- zeros are {-2, 3, 7} as verified by graphing
- end behavior: f(x) tends toward infinity with the same sign as x
Step-by-step explanation:
A graphing calculator makes finding or verifying the zeros of a polynomial function as simple as typing the function into the input box.
<h3>Zeros</h3>
The attachment shows the function zeros to be x ∈ {-2, 3, 7}, as required.
<h3>End behavior</h3>
The leading coefficient of this odd-degree polynomial is positive, so the value of f(x) tends toward infinity of the same sign as x when the magnitude of x tends toward infinity.
- x → -∞; f(x) → -∞
- x → ∞; f(x) → ∞
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
The function is entered in the graphing calculator input box in "Horner form," which is also a convenient form for hand-evaluation of the function.
We know the x^2 coefficient is the opposite of the sum of the zeros:
-(7 +(-2) +3) = -8 . . . . x^2 coefficient
And we know the constant is the opposite of the product of the zeros:
-(7)(-2)(3) = 42 . . . . . constant
These checks lend further confidence that the zeros are those given.
(The constant is the opposite of the product of zeros only for odd-degree polynomials. For even-degree polynomials. the constant is the product of zeros.)
Answer:
Yes it is.
Step-by-step explanation:
Just multiply everything by 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not sure what your problem here is.
you understand the inequality signs ?
anyway, to get
6×f(-2) + 3×g(1)
we can calculate every part of the expression separately, and then combine all the results into one final result.
f(-2)
we look at the definition.
into what category is -2 falling ? the one with x<-2, or the one with x>=-2 ?
is -2 < -2 ? no.
is -2 >= -2 ? yes, because -2 = -2. therefore, it is also >= -2.
so, we have to use
1/3 x³
for x = -2 that is
1/3 × (-2)³ = 1/3 × -8 = -8/3
g(1)
again, we look at the definition.
into what category is 1 falling ? the one with x > 2 ? or the one with x <= 1 ?
is 1 > 2 ? no.
is 1 <= 1 ? yes, because 1=1. therefore it is also <= 1.
so we have to use
2×|x - 1| + 3
for x = 1 we get
2×0 + 3 = 3
6×f(-2) = 6 × -8/3 = 2× -8 = -16
3×g(1) = 3× 3 = 9
and so in total we get
6×f(-2) + 3×g(1) = -16 + 9 = -7