Answer:
Explanation:
I honestly don't know how to answer this, but I can look into it and get back to you.
Answer: The correct answer is B : a $5,000 decrease in cash, a $15,000 increase in notes payable, and a $20,000 increase in equipment, all entered on the same date.
Explanation: The option B is correct because we are accounting for a purchase of a piece of equipment. The options in the questions show that the purchase was partly through cash and partly through notes payable. Since that is the case, the appropriate entries should record a cash outflow (credit to cash to decrease it), increase in notes payable as a result (credit to notes payable to increase) and subsequently, increase in equipment (debit to equipment). <em>So, the total credits equal the total debit.</em>
<em />
Answer:
Rare resources
Explanation:
Rare resources are unique resources that is not controlled or possessed by many competing firms. Only a small number of competing companies control it. It usually stands out by being distinctive among the set of future competitors. Rare resources are short in supply and capable of persisting over an extended time, this makes it a source of competitive advantage for a company.
Answer:
By paying user charges in the form of lock fees and fuel taxes.
Explanation:
The water carriers in repaying the government for the water way construction aid received do this by paying user charges in the form of lock fees and fuel taxes.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
