1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solong [7]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following were a part of Woodrow Wilson’s New Freedom platform?

History
1 answer:
Solnce55 [7]3 years ago
7 0
The answer to your question is c and e
You might be interested in
Which of the following is not part of the teachings of Confucius?
tatyana61 [14]

B. Achieving great power should be the correct answer.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the English Bill of Rights influence the Declaration of Independence?
barxatty [35]

Answer:

Explanation:

WilliamFM  is right the answer is A

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tent-like homes carried by the Mongols from place to place.
Andreas93 [3]
I believe its called a Yurt. Hope this helped!
6 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
What advantages did the Continental army have? Check all of the boxes that apply.
Elodia [21]

Well they had more familiarity with the area than the British

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best explains why the Silk Road was important?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the best use for a city map?
    5·1 answer
  • Choose the answer that is TRUE. A. Children were required to attend educational programs about Nazism. B. Hitler announced that
    8·1 answer
  • What was the United States response following the terrorist attacks on September 11,2001
    10·1 answer
  • Which statements correctly describe the African slave trade of the 1500s?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the significance of the English victory of the french and Indian war?
    5·1 answer
  • Where do most rivers on the east side of Australia begin?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Washington believe political parties were a threat to the nation?
    14·1 answer
  • CONSTRUCT - Construct a topic sentence that answers this question: What did the Egyptians believe about their gods’ control of t
    12·1 answer
  • How do you think Kagan views the work of most historians today?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!