Answer:
Explanation:
It is a rule used by the SS forces against Jews in World War II, and it means exactly what it says that they can destroy their property but cannot gain spoils of war over it. Prohibition of German Army looting Jewish homes
Near the end of a reports introductory paragraph
so the answer would b “A”
Peeta's pearl =D !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
“…I had, of course, in the great tradition of tragic romance, chosen to love a boy who was totally out of my reach.”
Answer:
The answer to your question is C.
The explanation for Option C:- raise an objection to his own opinion and counter that argument is:
On May 31, 1988 President Ronald Reagan addressed the students and faculty at Moscow State University (MSU). Although previous presidents desired such an opportunity, no other U.S. president except Richard M. Nixon had stood east of the Berlin Wall and spoken directly to the citizens of the Soviet Union. That Reagan would have such an opportunity was highly unlikely. Reagan appeared to be an implacable foe of the Soviet Union, previously calling it an "evil empire," describing it as "the focus of evil in the modern world," and accusing the Soviet "regime" of being "barbaric."
Thus, Reagan equated freedom with progress. Specifically, his thesis argued that human rights equal individual freedom; freedom equals individual creativity; individual creativity equals technological progress. The essence of the argument in Reagan's MSU address can be summarized as it follows:
There is a revolution taking place. It is spreading around the globe.
Hope this helps! :3
