Very worried about gaining weight- they want to be stick thin.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
When Wollstonecraft observed the women in her society, she thought of them as immature, weak in body and mind, and primarily interested in their appearance and other trivial pursuits.
<h3>Wollstonecraft describe the stereotypical woman of the time:</h3>
- Wollstonecraft observed the ladies in her society and thought solely of their clothing and other trivial pursuits, describing them as childlike, weak in body and mind.
- She may claim that women only acted in this way because of their knowledge by drawing comparisons to the plants and animals portrayed in natural history books.
- Similar to domestic animals, their genuine natures had been corrupted, but significantly, this also meant that through alternative education, there was a chance they would rediscover what she called woman's "natural state."
The traits men value in women are-
- High-value Women are aware that being a nice, enjoyable spouse increases their value and appeal.
- They also realise that in order to walk with a high value man, they will need to give up control of the relationship's framework and put their trust in him to act as the leader.
Wollstonecraft’s argument seek to counter such stereotypes by-
- She authored "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)", a groundbreaking feminist work in which she makes the case that the educational system purposefully taught women to be frivolous and incapable and that if girls were given the same advantages as boys, women would not only be exceptional wives and mothers but also competent workers.
- Then, in a ground-breaking statement, she continues, "I shall first evaluate women in the great light of human creatures, who, like men, are created on this earth to unveil their faculties.
To know more about the Wollstonecraft, here
brainly.com/question/8897834
#SPJ4
Cotton constantly needs the name nutrients from the soil and finally the soil didn’t have those nutrients and were no longer able to house cotton that’s often why farmers switch they’re crops yearly so the soil can rebuild the nutrients it needs
Answer: Charismatic leaders are self confident and charming
.
Transformational leaders use ideas to gain support
.
Explanation:
Charismatic leaders are interesting people to whom people are naturally drawn. They use this skill to lead people, knowing that they give off a sense of self confidence that inspires the confidence of others. In contrast, transformational leaders find a shared value or idea and use that to gain the support of their followers.
The two styles are similar in the sense that they both gain the support of followers, and are effective methods of leadership.
The difference between the two styles is the driving force, while charismatic leadership is built around the leader, transformational leadership is around an idea, and it usually involves the input of the other members of the team, not just the leader.
