1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VMariaS [17]
3 years ago
13

After World War II the United States occupied Japan and replace it imperial government with

History
2 answers:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
7 0
I think the answer is A
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
4 0

Marxism–Leninism is one of the main communist ideologies. It was the official state ideology of the Soviet Union and other ruling parties of the Eastern Bloc as well as the Communist International after Bolshevisation.[1] The goal of Marxism–Leninism is the transformation of a capitalist state into a one-party socialist state, commonly referred to by Western academics as communist state,[2][3][4][5] to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat.[6] This would be achieved by a revolution led by a vanguard party, who would be organized hierarchically and make decisions through democratic centralism.[7][8][9] The state would control the economy and means of production,[10] promote collectivism in society, suppress political dissent[9][10] and pave the way for an eventual communist society which would be both classless and stateless.[7] Marxist–Leninists generally support internationalism and oppose capitalism, fascism, imperialism and liberal democracy. As an ideology, it was developed by Joseph Stalin in the late 1920s based on his understanding and synthesis of both orthodox Marxism and Leninism.[11] Today, Marxism–Leninism is the ideology of Stalinist and Maoist political parties and remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.[7]

After the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, Marxism–Leninism became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union when Stalin and his supporters gained control of the party. It rejected the common notions among Western Marxists of world revolution, as a prerequisite for building socialism, in favour of the concept of socialism in one country. According to its supporters, the gradual transition from capitalism to socialism was signified by the introduction of the first five-year plan and the 1936 Soviet Constitution. The internationalism of Marxism–Leninism was expressed in supporting revolutions in other countries (e.g. initially through the Communist International or through the concept of socialist-leaning countries after de-Stalinisation). By the late 1920s, Stalin established ideological orthodoxy among the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks), the Soviet Union and the Communist International to establish universal Marxist–Leninist praxis.[12][13] In the late 1930s, Stalin's official textbook History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks) (1938) popularised the term Marxism–Leninism among communists and non-communists.[14]

Marxism–Leninist philosophy has been criticised by a broad political spectrum both on the left and right. Marxist–Leninist rule has been especially criticised, including by other socialists such as anarchists, communists, democratic socialists, libertarian socialists and Marxists. Marxist–Leninist states have been described as authoritarian, or accused of being totalitarian, for enacting repressions and killings of political dissidents and social classes (so-called "enemies of the people"), religious persecution, ethnic cleansing, forced collectivisation and use of forced labor in concentration camps.[15][8][16] Such states have been accused of genocidal acts in China, Poland and Ukraine.[17][18][19][20] Anti-Stalinist left and other left-wing critics see it as an example of state capitalism[21][22] and have referred to it as a "red fascism" contrary to left-wing politics.[23][24][25] Other leftists, including Marxist–Leninists, have criticised it for its repressive state actions while recognising certain advancements such as egalitarian achievements and modernisation under such states.[26][27] The socio-economic nature of Marxist–Leninist states has also been much debated, varyingly being labelled a form of bureaucratic collectivism, state capitalism, state socialism, or a totally unique mode of production

You might be interested in
The purpose of the The Great Wall of China, as originally constructed by the Qin Dynasty, was to A) prevent immigration. B) prev
Leno4ka [110]
It was originally constructed to prevent foreign invasion, specifically from the Mongolians. Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The word drug is derived from the fourteenth century french word drogue, meaning __________.
uysha [10]
Dry substance
I had this exact question last week
7 0
2 years ago
How has the two party system shaped American politics between 1790 and 1860?
Crank
<span>the 2 party system in American politics began with the federalists (hamilton) and democratic republicans (jefferson) 
i don't want to answer this essay for you, so i'll give you things to consider: 
-the revolution of 1800 (peaceful transition from federalists to democratic republicans) 
-"death" of the federalist party in 1815 (hartford convention) 
-single party --> democratic republicans, though lost ideals meant that the party was a mesh of people 
-Democratic Party = Andrew Jackson, 1828 
-Whigs (Anti-Jackson) = Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, 1833 
-Republican Party (combination of Whigs and members of the Free Soil Party) = Lincoln was primary spokesman (though not at first, his election gave a face to the party), 1854</span>
3 0
3 years ago
5. What are three ways industrialization affected the United States?
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

Most 18th century Americans lived in self-sustaining rural communities. The Industrial Revolution witnessed the evolution of large urban centers, such as Boston and New York City, and spurred a massive internal migration of workers. The Industrial Revolution also stimulated the rise of unskilled labor.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The magna carta and the english bill of rights shar which of these important characteristics.
nata0808 [166]
I can help A.) They both limit the power of monarchs. 

<span>Because they forced King John to sign the Magna Carta which limit the king's power. In the English Bill of Rights it limit the king and gave more rights to the people. No problem if this is right make this a brainiest answer </span><span />
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What years were the great depression
    11·1 answer
  • What was the predominant religion in Pennsylvania?Quakerism
    6·1 answer
  • Which is the best example of how geography influences history?
    13·2 answers
  • A tariff is a form of taxation on foreign products, while a quota is a ______ on imports from foreign countries.
    7·2 answers
  • Following world war l, the United States economy could be described as
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following reasons encouraged migration to and settlement in the new land
    9·2 answers
  • SELECT ALL THAT APPLY
    13·1 answer
  • Who did Sparta ask for money
    14·1 answer
  • What is the Selective Service Act?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the invention of the Internet change people's daily lives?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!