Aristotle lays the foundations for his political theory in Politics<span> book I by arguing that the city-state and political rule are “natural.” The argument begins with a schematic, quasi-historical account of the development of the city-state out of simpler communities. First, individual human beings combined in pairs because they could not exist apart. The male and female joined in order to reproduce, and the master and slave came together for self-preservation. The natural master used his intellect to rule, and the natural slave employed his body to labor. Second, the household arose naturally from these primitive communities in order to serve everyday needs. Third, when several households combined for further needs a village emerged also according to nature. Finally, “the complete community, formed from several villages, is a city-state, which at once attains the limit of self-sufficiency, roughly speaking. It comes to be for the sake of life, and exists for the sake of the good life” </span>
It could be described as a safehouse
<span>I think citizens allowed patricians to fix elections in medieval cities because </span>they needed their own extraordinary laws and were eager to pay for them and also that patricians were more esteemed, experienced, and more averse to foul up the region than plebeians.
Answer:
New Hampshire,Massachusetts,Rhode Island,and Conneticut.
Explanation:
<span>1.The Chinese did not have any more uses for a navy.
2.The voyages were becoming to expensive.
3.They wanted to divert their attention to stopping the Mongolians.
4.The Chinese began to adopt a policy of isolationism and did not want to interact with anyone.</span>https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130423165801AABEmGv