Too often medieval authors are cited merely for their negative reaction to the Mongols. Yet both the written sources and evidence from archeology show a picture of some complexity that requires critical analysis. The emphasis here is on archeology, often ignored or slighted by historians of the Mongols, and on evidence from Central Asia and Eastern Europe, primarily as reported in Russian-language scholarship. The impact of the Mongols varied depending on the location and the priorities of the new conquerors.
<u>Answer:</u>
C) New England.
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>(This is all my own writing, I took AP Human Geography and I am not copying this from anywhere.)</em>
In modern times, all of these regions/states are driven by economy, although Florida and North Carolina are driven more so by agriculture than New England. In Florida, there are large urban areas like Miami, Orlando, and Tampa, and tourism is one of the biggest economic drivers. In North Carolina, there are many urban areas like Raleigh and Charlotte, as well as many research centers. In New England, there are many urban areas as well, like Boston and Hartford.
But in older times, such as in the 1700's and 1800's, the South was primarily driven by agriculture, while New England was driven by industry, and eventually the Industrial Revolution in the late 19th century.
Hope this helps! Feel free to give me Brainliest if you feel this helped. Have a good day and good luck on your assignment! :)
After Alexander the great's death Antipater <span>received greece and macedonia</span>