1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klio [65]
2 years ago
6

The colonist perspective of the french and indian war​

History
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The colonists became the target for tax increase.

Explanation:

The French and Indian war was a battle between the Great Britain and France. But both sides recruited several natives American tribes to assist them during the war.( But France got more support from the native Americans than Britain).

The War cost Great Britain a lot of money. To the point where they started accumulating debt from the war. In order to pay off this debt, the British government need to increase their revenue. So, decided to increase the amount of tax that should be paid by the colonists.

You might be interested in
5. What does the 3rd Amendment say about the relationship between citizens and the military?
Trava [24]
The Third Amendment (Amendment III) to the United States Constitution places restrictions on the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, forbidding the practice in peacetime... Meaning that the Unites States military cannot use your home during times of peace.
8 0
3 years ago
The Articles of Confederation established
algol [13]
The sender should be congress
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Ghana grow into an empire
Likurg_2 [28]
Gradually, Ghana grew<span> very rich, due in large part to the trans- Saharan trade. The</span>ghana<span> required traders to give him a percentage of the products they were trading. ... As </span>Ghana grew<span> richer, the kingdom expanded </span>into an empire<span>, requiring neighboring groups of people to pay tribute</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast calhoun's south carolina exposition to the kentucky and virginia resolutions with regard to the doctrine of
Fudgin [204]
<span>Both documents concerned the rights of states to hold that a federal act was unconstitutional and to refuse to apply it. Calhoun's doctrine concerned the Tariff of Abominations and how SC would secede if it was not repealed. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolves concerned the Alien and Sedition Acts.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How was segregation different in the north than in the south
NARA [144]

Answer:

segregation in the north was de factowhile while segregation in the southwas de jure. Hope this helps!!

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A picture made from colored bits of stone and glass
    8·2 answers
  • What are factors of production and what role do they play in producing goods and services
    7·2 answers
  • What legal and political idea is contained in this edict from Hammurabi’s Code? A. limits of power B. protection from unreasonab
    14·1 answer
  • ¿Cuál fue la agencia que luchó contra el “peligro rojo” en el mundo?
    13·2 answers
  • mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
    14·2 answers
  • The Progressive Era included_____ involving equality, suffrage, improvement in the general welfare of people, and education, and
    11·1 answer
  • Which event helped create the counterculture of the 1960's and 70's
    15·1 answer
  • According to the UN, what country is ranked as having the most equal society? United States Japan Yemen Sweden
    12·2 answers
  • Help pls ‍‍ I need help
    10·2 answers
  • While capitalism believes in private ownership of property and businesses, communism believes in
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!