How did economic and social reforms by Diocletian and Constantine affect the Roman Empire?

History

1 answer:

Arisa [49]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

They changed the empire into a new state; the Late Roman Empire. This included a new governmental structure, a rigid economic and social system, and Christianity as the new state religion. Diocletian, believing that the empire had grown too large for a single ruler, he divided it into four units, prefectures, then the entire empire was split into two parts (east and west) that were each ruled by two rulers. Constantine built the new capital in the east, Constantinople. Both of their policies enlarged the civil service and the army (about 500,000 men, including german units). To fight inflation, diocletian issued a price edict that set wage price controls for the empire, which failed to work. so to ensure the tax base and to keep the empire going despite the labor shortage, they issued edicts of forcing workers to stay in their occupations. In conclusion, the economic and social policies of Diocletian and Constantine were based on control and coercion, and although temporarily successful, in the long run they stifled the very vitality the late empire needed to revive it's sagging fortunes.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which elements make up culture? check all that apply

Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

The major elements of culture are symbols, language, norms, values, and artifacts. Language makes effective social interaction possible and influences how people conceive of concepts and objects. Major values that distinguish the United States include individualism, competition, and a commitment to the work ethic.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What is another way to say ensure domestic tranqulity

Ganezh [65]

Answer:

peace at home

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Describe the geographic location of the United States

Mekhanik [1.2K]

Borders canada and mexico and the pacific and the atlantic

3 0

3 years ago

School-relayed- This is a survey for my journalism class. Comment yes or no and reasons why!

kvv77 [185]

Answer:

Yes, a teacher should make it mandatory for students to have their cameras on Zo om. (This is my opinion)

Explanation:

Many students may completely ignore the lesson when their camera is off and the teacher would no be aware of this. During tests, quizzes, or assignment students could easily cheat while their camera's were off and the teacher would not know. It is my belief that some students are irresponsible and can take advantage of a turned off camera.

I hope this helps! Sorry if it was too long! :)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did British policy in India fulfill the economic argument for establishing colonies?

VashaNatasha [74]

British policies in India were economically profitable at the expense of the Indians.

Explanation:

The colonial policies were justified by the enormous economic potential of the colonies wherein the cost incurred of production was to be extracted from the colony by itself and then the profits of the enterprise was taken away by the colonizer to their native country.

Thus, the policies implemented in India made the colony deplete of resources and filled the pockets of the colonizer which was the primary goal of colonialism.

4 0

3 years ago