Answer for the second
'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
The answer is C - small forces used hit-and-run tactics which prevented the British from establishing complete control of the South.
This was also called a guerrilla tactic.
“A totalitarian rule is when an individual has complete and absolute power. This means The individual can make Laws, control the military, and control the economy as they please in this case hitler’s Nazi Germans is a perfect example of this ideology.
Ruled the southern French kingdom of Navarre and stood next to Valois dynasty in the royal line of succession. Strongly opposed Huguenots; recruited and payed for large armies mostly from sections of northern and northwestern France.
Answer:
There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!
Explanation:
An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.
