The two contrasting views are explained below.
<h3>What are the Support for the publishing of the Pentagon papers.</h3>
Opponents of the war are mostly likely to support the publication of the Pentagon Papers because it is made up of evidence that shows that 4 successive US presidents had openly lied to the people and the world about America's involvement in the Vietnam war.
Daniel Ellsberg, military analyst was known to be one of the people who agitated that the information that is in the Pentagon Papers be be available to the American public. He even gave the information to the New York Times.
<h3 />
The New York Times was said to have made public and were said to have published a series of front-page articles through the use of the the information found in the Pentagon Papers.
<h3>What are the Against the notion above?</h3>
President Nixon was known to be one of the people who was against it and he stated that he did not want the New York Times to make public any more articles on the issue as he believes that publishing the Pentagon Papers can harm U.S. national security.
Note that the New York Times were also against what President Nixon said as they believed that the people had the right to know what was present in the Pentagon Papers. Also, the New York Times disagreed that publishing the Pentagon Papers.
Learn more about Pentagon Papers from
brainly.com/question/3908633
#SPJ1
Answer:
America's involvement in World War II had a significant impact on the economy and workforce of the United States. ... Our involvement in the war soon changed that rate. American factories were retooled to produce goods to support the war effort and almost overnight the unemployment rate dropped to around 10%.
Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
Answer:
the answer would be climate
Explanation:
