Answer:
d
Explanation: plz brainlyest i need it to rank up
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
Answer:third objective
Explanation:This is when the narrator tells the story of a particular person without describing or stating that person's feelings, thoughts or opinions but just state what happens to make the story unbiased so that they don't take sides .
Here we find the narrator telling us of what is happening exactly as it happens without telling us how Melinda feels or think as all of these things are happening to her.
