1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
12

The legislative branch at the state level is similar to the federal level because

History
2 answers:
lana66690 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Both have agency and department heads that manage duties. Both allow citizens to elect all leaders of executive departments. Both can draft and pass laws governing citizens' behavior.

Explanation:

Wewaii [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Both have agency and department heads that manage duties. ... Both allow citizens to elect all leaders of executive departments. Both can draft and pass laws governing citizens' behavior.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The Nazis established two types of ghettos. The closed ghetto was so called because _. The open ghettos were fewer in number and
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

1- Jews could not move out of the ghetto,

2- Jews were permitted to move out of the ghettos

3 0
3 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
GUYS ANSWER QUICK The Aztecs built their civilizations on islands in lake Texcoco. Their capital was called Tenochitalan. What i
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

search it up

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of this amendment?
morpeh [17]
The purpose of the amendment was to impede a law for the constitution to be greater
3 0
2 years ago
The top leader in the Aztec government was the __________.
ZanzabumX [31]
The answer is letter A.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was irrigation their fields easier for Egyptians land for Mesopotamians?
    10·1 answer
  • Question 11 (5 points)
    13·2 answers
  • What were the short- and long-term results of the ""Jim Crow"" system in the South? Why was the sharecropping system so hard to
    12·1 answer
  • How many Union casualties were suffered at Chancellorsville?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the new mass culture reflect technological and social changes in the 1920s?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the repeal of prohibition beneficial to the economy during the Great Depression?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Ghana traded its gold for all of the following except
    7·1 answer
  • According to rasmussen , why was the slave revolt a hidden story​
    10·2 answers
  • Lydia made a bad decision one night and decided to rob a bank. In the process, the bank
    5·1 answer
  • Who serves as both the head of government and the head of state in South Korea? Chairman (Dictator) Premier President Prime Mini
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!