Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
