The British government endeavored to limit conflict between Native Americans and colonists by placing limits on where the colonists could go in treaties. The Native Americans worked under the assumption that the colonists would follow these limits but the colonists largely ignored the limits and continued to encroach on the Native Americans land.
<span>he Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed. Opposition was intense, but ultimately the bill passed in May of 1854. Territory north of the sacred 36°30' line was now open to popular sovereignty. The North was outraged.The political effects of Douglas' bill were enormous. Passage of the bill irrevocably split the Whig Party, one of the two major political parties in the country at the time. Every northern Whig had opposed the bill; almost every southern Whig voted for it. With the emotional issue of slavery involved, there was no way a common ground could be found. Most of the southern Whigs soon were swept into the Democratic Party. Northern Whigs reorganized themselves with other non-slavery interests to become the REPUBLICAN PARTY, the party of Abraham Lincoln. This left the Democratic Party as the sole remaining institution that crossed sectional lines. Animosity between the North and South was again on the rise. The North felt that if the Compromise of 1820 was ignored, the Compromise of 1850 could be ignored as well. Violations of the hated Fugitive Slave Law increased. Trouble was indeed back with a vengeance.</span>
The “final solution” refers to the mass murder of Europe’s Jews. It was a term used by Nazi Germany’s Leaders and it is supposed to be the solution of the Jewish question.
Hi I think your cute but don’t know how to tell u so I’m going to on here whoa man whoa
Answer:
France is the most beatiful country in Europe.
Explanation:
This is the answer because the other sentences are writtin in a factual point of view. While'st when you look at the France sentence you can tell that they are stateing what they think. Meaing that this sentence is opinonated.
