Answer:
The people
Explanation:
Stole it from someone who already asked this question so it makes me look good. look it up.
The correct answer is C) They would be angry because such development would severely limit their only access to freshwater in the region.
<em>If Turkey were to build twenty more dams on these rivers, this most likely affects Syria and Iraq in that they would be angry because such development would severely limit their only access to freshwater in the region. </em>
Turkey, Syria, and Iraq have been faced with water problems since many years ago. Water is a scarce resource in the Middle East due to desert conditions and is a big issue for these countries. Syria, Turkey, and Iraq have not reached an agreement on a water settlement over the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates because Syria and Turkey have built dams to generate electricity and store water, and this reduces the water supply in Iraq. So the real thing is that each country has its own interests and agendas and neither of them has considered the other nation's necessities in order to reach a fair agreement for the three of them.
Answer:
spread the revolution and destroy other monarchies.
Explanation:
Both want a change from being ruled by an absolute ruler, both have economic instability from war debt, both have social inequality. And also, both started because of enlightenment ideas. What was the major difference between the American and French Revolutions? The American revolution didn't have the reign of terror.
Both the American and French Revolutions were focused around liberty and equality. ... America was trying to gain freedom from the rules and taxes put upon them by Great Britain. Whereas the French wanted to abolish the French monarchy and create a better government in which the people could have more of a say in society.
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
