Answer: Maybe because they were <span>motivated more by commerce than territorial expansion for its own sake, but that one led to the other seems inevitable.
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
member of a community or tribe not belonging to one of the great civilizations
Explanation:
Answer:
Tiger grrrr lol jsp it would be a <u>WOLF</u> , John Locke would be represented as a lone wolf an animal that acts independently or generally lives or spends time alone instead of with a group not being led by one single leader (Monarch) and having a more complex governing of himself (Democracy).
Explanation:
Represnting Locke, all humans have pre-political rights that afford them protection against the aggression of others. <em>But where does this leave animals? For Locke, animals do not have natural rights, and therefore human interactions with animals are property governed (Side By Side Comparison to The Governing of Rights with a single Monarch as a leader and then a Majority Ruled GOVT) </em>. <u>John would be an independent self governed animal such as a more complex democracy .</u>
Answer: In Europe and Asia, colonial expansion resulted from the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed commerce to build vast empires. Most of the defeated communities were small or disorganised.
Explanation:
Imperial expansion in Europe and Asia resulted from the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed trade to establish large empires. Most of the groups that were conquered were weak or disorganized.
