Answer:
This question seems to point to the overall trajectory of US government foreign policy in the 19th century. One of the most enduring legacies of Washington's Farewell Address was the suggestion that the US government withhold from pledging permanent allegiances or alliances with foreign countries.
Explanation:
Monroe and the Farewell Address
James Monroe was the fifth president of the United States (from 1817 to 1825) and he had worked as a foreign minister and ambassador to France during Washington's government. President Monroe institution what would later be known as the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. It stated that the United States would not intervene in European affairs, thus extending the ideas of non-alliance that had been emphasized by Washington in his farewell address. There would be no intervention by the USA in European affairs so long as no one in Europe sought to colonize or otherwise interfere with the Latin American nations in the Western Hemisphere that were newly independent.
Theodore Roosevelt
If Monroe's foreign policy approach marked the consolidation of Washington's views on alliances and allegiances to foreign powers as embodied in the Farewell Address, one of the legacies of Teddy Roosevelt's presidency is that it ends this era of non-intervention and isolationism. Teddy Roosevelt was president of the United States from 1901-1909. The foreign policy endeavors undertaken by Teddy Roosevelt were not neutral or isolationist, although he continued to make claims to be non-interventionist in domestic politics because this was now an entrenched political position on the part of the United States as a whole. Roosevelt believed that the United States was becoming a world power after the Spanish–American War, so he sought ways to assert influence abroad. He mediated and hosted discussions to end the Russo-Japanese war, for example. Teddy Roosevelt is famous for using Big Stick Diplomacy so using the threat of force or strong-handed measures. He also instituted what became known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which allowed the US to act a policing force in the Western Hemisphere and that European interests had to use the United States as an intermediary when taking up issues with Latin American nations.
According to the question, Some negative effects of urbanization include the following.
- Crime
- Lack of Clean Water
- Fire
Urbanization brings about crime because it leads to less possibility of arrests and the less probability of recognition of crime suspect because families are less intact in urban areas.
Also the time of crimes committed in urban areas significantly differs from that in rural areas. some of the crimes include property thefts, automobile thefts, pick pocketing, cheating etc.
The process of rapid urbanization can bring about imbalance between water supply and demand and lead to higher likelihood of water shortage conditions.
With the spring up of factories and industries, natural water is polluted and hence there is lack of good water for human use.
Urban areas are more prone to deadly and severe fire outbreaks. this is due to the compact nature of buildings and the presence of industries that make use of elements which can lead to fire outbreak.
Learn more about Urbanization at brainly.com/question/12007420
#SPJ1
Answer:
During the Korean War, General Douglas MacArthur challenged President Harry S. Truman's authority as foreign policy leader and commander in chief of the armed forces. This resulted in the first major test of civilian control of the military in American history.
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure the answer is yes.
Maybe option (B?
I hope I helped but if I didn’t I’m sorry
