According to Mikhail Gorbachev, the way in which President Ronald Reagan’s attitude toward the Soviet Union <span>changed during his second term was that he became more understand. </span>
Answer: it represented the final chance for a lasting reconciliation between Union and Confederate forces on Southern soil
Explanation:
Fort Sumter guarded the harbor at Charleston, South Carolina, and was commanded by the Unionist Major Robert Anderson. Secessionists forces demanded total withdrawal of federal forces from the fort. Lincoln understood that giving up on Fort Sumter would be giving up the Union. He ordered the resupply of the Fort, but President Jefferson Davis and his Confederates decided to not follow Lincoln's decision. At four-thirty on the morning of April 12, the Confederate shelling of Fort Sumter began. And after 36 hours of crossfire, the Unionists lowered the flag on April 13. The fall of Fort Sumter started the Civil War and ignited a wave of bravado across the Confederate states. The guns of Charleston signaled the end of the waiting game.
Answer:
The right answer is "expansion."
Explanation:
The Manifest Destiny is a 19th-century doctrine that envisions US inevitable territorial expansion westward to the Pacific and beyond, as an expression of the will of divine Providence. It was used to justify the purchases of territory or the annexation of Texas, California, New Mexico, or generally, of all policy actions aimed at expanding US reach and power.
Answer:
Operationally the League was hampered throughout its existence by the reluctance of its member states to intervene in international disputes and apply collective security mechanisms. One of the most egregious cases was the League's weak response to Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931.
Explanation:
Slavery was prominent in the South. Southern states wanted to count enslaved African Americans as part of their populations. This would give these states more votes in the House of Representatives. At the time, there were more than 550,000 enslaved African Americans. Counting them would add many representatives. The North, however, had fewer representatives. The enslaved people couldn't vote or participate in government. The North didn't want them to be counted.
The 3/5 compromise meant that every five enslaved persons would equal three free persons. This was effective because the North and South had equally gained what they had wanted- enslaved persons to be counted or not to be counted. (This rule was applied for assessing taxes on the states as well)
<h3>Hope this helped :)</h3>
