It depends on your definition of hero, I guess. The fact that Gandhi and MLK did not use force to advocate for their opinions was mature and moral. They did not give up the first time. But maybe if the cause is correct, one might have to break the stated law, and become a hero.
If you are referring to the period of reconstruction after the Civil War, then the answer would be yes. At this time, much of the North was not only structurally stable, but economically as well due to the fact that the North had more industrial areas with which to produce goods faster, plus did not have to pay the reparations that the South did after the war. Much of the areas in the North were converted into war time factories which were able to produce things like guns and ammunition quicker than the South during the Civil War, and was just as easy to convert back to civil factories which would produce the steel needed to rebuild what was lost during the war. Along with the fact of many more opportunities were offered in the North at this time with there being an influx of work for both the urban and rural areas which meant that one could work in a factory, be a farmer, or whatever they chose to be, versus in the South where much of the work was mainly rural and only were able to offer jobs such as farming and ranching.
Tigris and Euphrates Rivers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18. The 5–4 decision overruled Stanford v. Kentucky, in which the court had upheld execution of offenders at or above age 16, and overturned statutes in 25 states.
Where I got the Information:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roper_v._Simmons