When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
Answer:
Strongly disagree
Explanation:
For the first time in many Nigerian’s lives, it is abundantly clear that we are not at peace. We are not insulated from the problems of the Nation. We are at war with one another, if not tribe difference; is religious or political manipulations all in the name of freedom and peace. I believe once freedom should be a personal actualization. But peace should be a collective effort to move a nation forward.
Therefore one can have peace but not have freedom to oppress his fellow man.
Stephen Hawking was born in Oxford, England, he was a brilliant man who outshined everyone in his class, even with his physcial obstacles he moved with his whole life. Later in Hawking's life he studied physics at Oxford University. Hawking went on to become a writer researching cosmology and the orgins of the universe.
Answer:
.d. He will think that cheating is a morally justifiable behavior.
Explanation:
John is caught cheating on an assignment that is a clear violation of school policy. He suffers no consequence. From a social cognitive perspective, John will believe cheating is morally justifiable because he suffered no consequence from the previous wrongdoing he engaged himself in.
If John was made to face disciplinary measures as a result of his cheating, he would have acknowledged and seen his wrong and understand that there are consequences for cheating but as he faced no consequences, he believes what he did was morally acceptable.
