Answer:
b. $750 per direct labor
Explanation:
Calculation for the what was the predetermined overhead rate
Using this formula
Predetermined overhead rate=Factory overhead / Direct labor hours
Let plug in the formula 
Predetermined overhead rate=$1,500,000/$200,000 hours
Predetermined overhead rate= 7.5*100
Predetermined overhead rate=$750 per direct labor
Therefore the predetermined overhead rate will be $750 per direct labor
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
For the Economist A the spending multiplier  is = 8, the tax multiplier = 4, the increase in spending is = $4 billion, the tax cut is = $8 billion.
For the Economist B, the spending multiplier is =4, the tax multiplier = 2, the increase in spending is = $8 billion, the tax cut is = $16 billion.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
(1)The Economist A
The Spending multiplier = 8
In closing the output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 8 = $4 billion
Thus,
The tax multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
(2)The Economist B
Now,
The spending multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
So,
Tax multiplier = 2
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 2 = $16 billion
 
        
             
        
        
        
When the economy is not at full employment and an expansionary monetary policy is followed:
- Interest rates decrease 
- Investment spending increases 
When there is an expansionary monetary policy in place, more money is pumped into the economy which means that there are more loanable funds. This increase in the supply of loanable funds will decrease the interest associated with them. 
As a result of interest rates being lower, more businesses and people will be able to borrow money and invest in projects thereby increasing investment spending. 
In conclusion, there will be an increase in investment spending due to a decrease in interest rates. 
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2343055. </em>
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Comprehension monitoring
Explanation:
This example suggests that Carlos has good Comprehension monitoring skills
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
A) Accounting for bonds and notes under US GAAP and IFRS is similar.
Explanation:
US GAAP and IFRS do not have the same accounting guideline for bond issue cost:
Under US GAAP, bonds payable is recorded at face value while premiums or discounts are recorded separately. While under IFRS, bonds payable is recorded using the carrying value, and amortization or premiums or discounts is done by using the effective-interest method.