The correct answer is option C (prevent).
Explanation: in this case the only possible option is "prevent" because the main idea of the sentence relates to "precautions" and "accidents", so it means that the author wants accidents not to happen.
Option A would sound incoherent as precautions are not meant to create accidents. Option B is not possible as the verb "ensure" implies to make something happen for sure and accidents just occur unexpectedly.
Option D is also not possible because accidents cannot be interrupted by being cautious, they either happen or not.
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Working against the natural tendencies of the environment leads to long-term consequences.
Explanation:
In the first paragraph, the theme of green literature is evidenced when the writer references the damage to New York City's topography due to the need to build deep underground subways that double as bomb shelters.
In the second passage, the imagery used by the writer gives a clearer picture of the damage that was done to the environment.
In the first passage, the potential hazard arises because sewer lines have to be pumped uphill with subways below them.
If there is an earthquake, for instance, the entire structure comes crashing down.
In the second passage, the damage was already done, leaving Norwegians with the problem of how to create soils upon which plant fauna could thrive. Had they, managed the tree population by planting more than they were cutting, they probably would have avoided the "<em>green problem".</em>
Cheers
The difference between a paraphrase and a quotation is that you use your own words to restate the ideas of the original in a paraphrase, but in a quotation you use the exact words.
<h3>What is quotation?</h3>
Quotation means extracting words from the source and using four to five words from the source exactly the same.
For example, taking a sentence from the source same as written in the source and quoted it in your writing.
Thus, the correct option is D)
Learn more about quotation
brainly.com/question/1434552
#SPJ1
Answer:
Phones should be allowed in school because if the school does not have enough Chromebooks, students can use their phones. Furthermore, phones can help save the school from limited access to technology and save the school from wasting money. For example, if students do not have a Chromebook for a science class, they can use their phones to work on their science class. It can also help people communicate with each other, including something during an emergency. For example, parents can call their children to see where they are, how they are doing, what is going on in school, etc. That is a beneficial thing. Lastly, phones are useful for taking pictures of very long or detailed notes. For example, if a teacher writes much information about a physics unit and the student does not have enough time. The student can take a picture of the notes and move on quickly. After that, once they get home, they can write down all the notes that the teacher wrote. With that, it can help students efficiently. That is the last reason. Some people say that phones make students get distracted from learning new things. For example, a student might listen to music during class with a phone and not listen to the teacher's attention. If that happens, the teacher can take away their phone and give them back at the end of class. Some people also say that some students misuse their phones by doing something else instead of doing their school work. For example, using social media, However, if that happens, then the teachers can take the student's phone and give a warning at first. If the child still misbehaves like this, they can send the student to the office, then call their parents and tell them everything.
Explanation:
Hope it helped!