Based on the article, I think that the benefits created through public programs outweigh their expenses.
<h3>What are public programs?</h3>
Public programs are assistance programs created by governments at different levels to assuage the humanitarian needs of society, especially the poor and needy.
For example, the federal government provides Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Supplemental Security Income, and the Earned Income Credit.
Other examples of public programs by the federal government include Medicaid, Food Stamps, and housing assistance.
Thus, when weighed on humanitarian grounds, the benefits created through public programs outweigh their expenses.
Learn more about the benefits of public programs at brainly.com/question/508027
#SPJ1
The reader needs to know your sources to check originality or for plagiarism
Answer:
Pax Romana which is Latin for "Roman Peace" was a time, as the name suggests, a long period of peace and minimal military expansion from 27 BC to about 180 AD. Pax Romana was succesful because all of the land surrounding the Mediterranean was at peace because everyone was under Roman Law.
Explanation:
The 200 years of the Pax Romana saw many advances and accomplishments, particularly in engineering and the arts. To help maintain their sprawling empire, the Romans built an extensive system of roads. These durable road facilitated the movement of troops and communication.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Atoms, like energy, cannot be created or destroyed, therefore the answer is B
Well, from looking at the chart, it seems that there's a huge loss of life on the "winning" side. I believe the people of those countries must've felt emotionally and economically defeated. Considering the great amount of lives lost during the war, I'd say it would effect the society emotionally and there'd be fewer people around. And during wars countries usually use lots of money and weaponry to fund the cause, so those nations must've been in a huge economic crisis once the war ended. <span />
