Answer:
<h3>If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
- The statement that best explains an enlightenment position on the divine right to rule is "If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society."
- If we look from an enlightenment position, authority and power should be derived from reason as it does not believe in divine right theory of power and legitimacy.
- It believes that rights and liberties of the people are infringed upon and other forms of rational democratic processes are undermined when only one person takes control over the whole power.
Are you Australian? In that case it would rather ironically be the Aboriginals and their children. If not, (and I'm not 100 percent sure about this one) but this was during the time period of the African American rights Reform period in the United States.
It would be A. One of the earliest took place in Asia and E. All Spanish ships were either destroyed or captured outside the Santiago harbor. During the war the US fleet destroy two fleets of the Spanish forces in the Battle of Manila Bay and Battle of Santiago Bay. The success of American forces during the war increase the prestige of United States in the world.
Early medieval Germanic kings were itinerant because the regime thought it was a better system to monitor the realm. A monarchical government required personal relations and showing presence. Unlike having a capital city where the kingdom is ruled by assigning geographical areas to local rulers.
