The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question seems incomplete and lacks context, reference, or specific question, we can say the following.
It is understandable to think that is not possible that two contradictory interpretations can be correct at the same time. That is why they are considered contradictory. But what it is interesting using logical thoughts is that if we consider that there are interpretations can be correct in many different ways. Everything depends on the belief systems and education of the receiver. There could be two people that interpret different things from the same statement. And yes, this is possible because the educational background and experience of people are different. What can be good for one culture, can be bad for another culture.
Hey there.
The answer is either:
A. <span>determination to keep outsiders from changing traditional beliefs and practices.
OR
D. </span><span>desire to remain economically and culturally self-sufficient.
If I had to say though, I would probably say A.
Have a great day!
</span>
Answer:
The us supreme court.
Explanation:
Most appeals are final. The court of appeals decision usually will be the final word in the case, unless it sends the case back to the trial court for additional proceedings, or the parties ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. In some cases the decision may be reviewed en banc, that is, by a larger group of judges (usually all) of the court of appeals for the circuit.
Shadoof is a type of irrigation.
