Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Megan’s balance sheet shows:
Total assets = $27,600
Total debts = $32,500
Net worth is the difference between total assets and total liability.
Net worth = Total assets - Total debts
= $27,600 - $32,500
= -$4,900
Therefore,
Megan’s balance sheet shows the negative worth of $4,900.
The EOQ is 980 units and should reduce the fixed ordering cost to an amount of $62.50.
<u>Explanation:</u>
a)
Annual demand=Qty per mth multiply with 12 = 1000 multiply with 12 =12000
Annual demand in USD, A= 12000 multiply with USD 100 (cost of each part) = USD 1200000
Preparation cost, P= 4 hrs changeover time multiply with USD 250 per hr = USD 1000
Annual holding cost, I = 25% = 0.25
EOQ in USD= Root over (2 multiply with A multiply with P divide by I ) = USD 9.79 multiply with 10000 = USD 98000
EOQ in nos. = USD 98000 divide by USD 100 (cos of each part) = 980 units
b) Q = 980 divide by 4 = 245
In this case, annual carryring cost, C = EOQ 980 by 4 multiply with 0.5 multiply with Unit cost USD 100 multiply with 0.25 = USD 3062.50
Annual demand, D = 1000 per month multiply with 12 = 12000
Ordering cost = C multiply with 245 / D = USD 62.50
The face value per share.
Answer:
36.26%
Explanation:
Simple rate of return:
return/investment
<u>return:</u>
In this case, it will be the cost saving for the new machine: 161,000
<u>investment</u>
We will decrease the investment by the recovery from the old machine.
468,000 new machine - 24,000 salvage value of new = 444,000
<u>Then, proceed to calculate:</u>
161,000/444,000 = 0.3612 = 36.26%
Consideration:
Is important to state that this rate, do not consider the time value of money, neither the cash flow of the project.