I believe one was the middle east
This is what you’re looking for I think. Hope this helped.
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
If Prussia had not belonged to the German Confederation, it would be most likely that Germany would not achieve unification during that period.
Prussia was proven to be the most strategic region that gave away victories to the Germans, making them able to control the flow of the conquest of other regions. Hope this helps
