The presidency of Abraham Lincoln<span> began on March 4, 1861, and ended with </span>Lincoln<span>'s death by assassination on April 15, 1865, one month into his second term. This article details President </span>Lincoln's<span> actions during the American </span>Civil War<span>. ... His assassination five days </span>after<span> the end of the war left the final challenge of </span>After<span> Abraham </span>Lincoln's<span> defeat in the race for the U.S. Senate, he spent the next ... badly shattered Democratic Party reconvened in June, there was no </span>hope<span> for unity. ... Although the other three candidates </span>did<span> little or no active campaigning, each ... In the middle of a devastating </span>civil war, the United States held its presidential <span>A summary of </span>Lincoln's<span> Ten-Percent Plan: 1863–1865 in History SparkNotes's ... his plan for Reconstruction to reunify the North and South </span>after<span> the </span>war's<span> end. ... 10 percent of its </span>voters<span> (from the </span>voter<span> rolls for the election of 1860) swore an oath of ... Unlike Radical Republicans in Congress, </span>Lincoln did not wan<span>Abraham </span>Lincoln<span>'s position on slavery is one of the central issues in American history. ... During the </span>Civil War<span>, </span>Lincoln<span> used the war powers of the presidency to issue the ... in September 1862 he would </span>do<span> so if the Confederate states </span>did<span> not return. ... enforcement to capture fugitive slaves, and a popular </span>vote<span> on the matter.</span>t to punish
C) Henry Tift is the answer you need I think
With regard to the the text "The Americans: Reconstruction to the 21st Century" the historical development that contributed most directly to the Market Revolution is the emergence and or increase in new forms of transportation.
It is to be noted that the options referenced are unavailable hence the general answer.
<h3>What is the explanation of the above concept?</h3>
A market revolution was revolutionizing American industry and worldwide trade in the 1820s and 1830s. Independent craftspeople were progressively supplanted by factories and mass manufacturing.
Farms flourished and produced items for distant markets rather than local consumers, exporting them via cheap transportation such as the Erie Canal.
The market revolution spurred tremendous economic expansion and increased personal riches, but it also created a rising lower class of property-less laborers and a series of severe depressions known as "panics," trapping many Americans in never-ending cycles of poverty.
<h3>Who benefited the most from the market revolution?</h3>
Most American farmers' living circumstances improved as a result of the market revolution. For example, a mattress that cost $50 in 1815 (when nearly no one possessed one) cost $5 in 1848. (and everyone slept better).
Learn more about Market Revolution in America:
brainly.com/question/14189684
#SPJ1
Answer:
They both wanted to have absolute power over the country
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer would be D tho,
Explanation:
Before the Panama Canal was completed in 1941, the only way to trade was to sail around Cape Horn in South America which was a 13,000 mile trip and it took about 3-6 months. It was a rough journey with seasickness, and treacherous waters. However, once the Panama Canal was completed, the distance was cut by almost half to 5200 miles and the time of journey down to about a month.
Because of the Canal, the U.S. was able to ship supplies so much faster. The faster a country can ship, the more willing they are to trade. They are willing to trade more because they don't have to spend so much money on fuel. Because they spend less money on fuel, they can carry more supplies. Now most all the money the U.S. gets from trade is through the Panama Canal. If you are confused, here is an example of how it works. If England were selling products to Peru, England's economy would suffer if the Canal were not operating. Without access to the Canal, the cost of exports from England to Peru would significantly increase because England would have to regain the added expenses involved in sailing around South America. Because of increased prices, Peru could not afford to purchase as many products from England, which in turn would decrease England's revenues gained from exports. Decreased revenues means that England would have less money available to purchase products from the United States and other countries. A "domino effect" would be set in motion as the United States and other countries experienced similar problems with their exports and imports.
America prospers from the same example. If San Fransisco wanted to make trade with New York, and they were trading perishable food items, the three month voyage (without the canal) would spoil the food. But with the Panama Canal the one month voyage would keep the goods perfectly ripe and ready for trade.
Hope this helps
