1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-BARSIC- [3]
3 years ago
9

What did baker fear would happen with growing intolerance toward dissent

History
1 answer:
Burka [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the risk of being punished and prosecuted strictly.

Explanation:

US Secretary of War Newton Baker feared for the safety of those individuals who showed dissent towards the government.

With acts like Espionage Act of 1917 and The Sedition Act of 1918, the government clearly exhibited its intolerance towards any form of opposition.

Baker felt that the growing intensity of suspicion and hostility toward disloyalty and dissent in the country would put more people on the risk of being punished and prosecuted strictly.

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a way americans on the home front sacrificed to aid the war effort in world war ll.
KatRina [158]
The correct answer is b-forming neighborhood militilas
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anybody good at reading political cartoon in history and know #2 and 3?
Eva8 [605]

1 the earth is being smooshed by russa and US bombs.

2it is saying that the bombs explosions were too big for the earth.

6 0
3 years ago
(BRAINLIEST QUESTION)
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:n

Explanation:

n

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the countries you labeled remained neutral in 1942
OleMash [197]
<span>Spain, Ireland, Turkey, Sweden and Saudi Arabia remained neutral in 1942. These countries did not want to get attack by the Axis or Allies forces, so they stayed out of the World War 2 during 1942. Even though countries avoided joining the war to prevent attacks, they were still attacked anyway. Ireland and Switzerland faced bombings and fleet attacks.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What are some possible advantages of having only two powerful political parties
Brums [2.3K]
All of the power doesn't go to one party. There is an option for two. And it forces people to decide what they think to do with only two parties instead of more than two
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • America's victory in the revolutionary war was made more probable because of the aid provided by France. TRUE OR FALSE
    10·1 answer
  • The passage below is an excerpt from Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations (1776). Use the passage to answer the following question
    7·2 answers
  • Choose all that apply. What are three characteristics of the Great Wall of China? world’s longest humanmade structure at more th
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following does the english bill of rights say about the monarchys right to tax its subjects
    13·2 answers
  • Why did poison have to be tasteless?
    8·2 answers
  • Who won the battle of D-day
    11·1 answer
  • According to the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution, how long may a president serve?
    7·2 answers
  • What's an advantage of an alphabet over hieroglyphics?
    6·2 answers
  • How did most Africans become enslaved?
    5·1 answer
  • In a dicataorship how is rule of law regarded
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!