Answer:
E). The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.
Explanation:
As per the question, option E displays the assumption 'the Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members' on which the argument lies as it is rightly assumed by logic. This assumption clearly justifies the conclusion 'lesser affluent families receiving a fee reduction' aptly. The other options fail to validate the conclusion as it offers an illogical yet inappropriate claim. Therefore, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer as it reasonably justifies the claim/argument.
The answer would be a because many of the gold diggers actually didn't find gold. hope this helped :3
Answer:
a. The second sentence provides background for the first
Explanation:
According to the first sentence, research has proven that colorful and vivid advertisements helps to attract more people.
Additionally, the second statement says that marketers use various research studies to develop their advertisement.
The relationship between the two sentences is that the second sentence provides background for the first by explaining how the market research has helped.
Which Act do you need the metaphor from?
<span />
Answer:sorry i dont know how to answer this question
Explanation:
sorry once again
