1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darina [25.2K]
3 years ago
15

In at least one hundred words, summarize "The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain."

English
2 answers:
Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

In “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain,” a short essay published by The Nation in 1926, poet Langston Hughes writes about the importance of embracing black culture and the necessity for black artists and authors not to conform to a standardized (i.e. white) idea of artistic expression.

Hughes begins his essay with a quote from a poet he does not name, but which contextual details indicate may have been Hughes's contemporary Countee Cullen. Cullen says, essentially, that he wants to be known as a poet of merit, not as a “Negro poet.” Hughes is appalled by Cullen's statement, his denial of his skin color and heritage. He makes it clear in the first paragraph of the essay that this situation, in which the black artist strives for “standardization” and whiteness, is the racial mountain indicated in the title of the piece, which all African-American artists fight to climb.

Hughes analyzes the background of the young poet he quotes. He talks about how the poet was most likely striving toward whiteness because of his upbringing – his parents both worked for rich white people, and he came from a comfortable, middle-class, church-going family. He also attended an unsegregated school, one of few in the region where he was raised, which may have contributed to his rejection of his heritage. Hughes writes that because of his upbringing, this poet was never taught the beauty and value of his own heritage, only the beauty and value of whiteness.

Hughes continues on to describe the differences between “high-class” and the more common African-American homes. These high-class homes he describes are notably whitewashed. He depicts a family with a well-educated father and a light-skinned mother with a job in the service industry, or no job at all. The focus of the family is on the church and material objects. On the other side of the coin, Hughes notes, the majority of black families live a different kind of life. Hughes describes the joy and playfulness of neighborhoods full of jazz music, drinking, and dancing in Washington and Chicago. These places are livelier, less reserved, and proud of their culture and their heritage. Hughes makes it clear that in these neighborhoods, black people are not rejecting a white way of life. Rather, they are living the life they choose to live, one that feels joyful to them, without caring what white people think of it. Hughes makes it clear that he is thankful that there are more of these kinds of African-American homes, where there is pride in black heritage and culture.

Hughes then begins to discuss more explicitly his hatred of standardization and how he feels it impedes upon black voices. This is done, he argues, through American culture and education. Children of all races are taught that certain aspects of culture are more valuable than others and that there are certain parameters for what should be expressed, taught, or exhibited. Though Hughes makes it clear that historically, these valued expressions were made primarily by white men, he acknowledges that the U.S. of the 1920s is experiencing a cultural moment that values black art and black writing. Rather than allowing black artists to disappear from the spotlight only weeks after producing their work, if they are known at all, Hughes notes that in contemporary America it is hip to enjoy black music, art, and writing. This, he thinks, is also dangerous. He expresses his concerns about how black art catering to white interests could dilute the uniqueness of the artist that made them popular to begin with.

Hughes finishes his essay with a distinct note about why he writes about black issues. He makes it clear that he believes that every issue in America is a racial issue and that to write otherwise is to deny one’s own heritage and reject one’s family's legacy and history. Hughes suggests that choosing not to write from the perspective of the black experience as an African-American is the same as giving in to one standardized view of beauty and art.

Hughes, one of America's most famous poets, was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship as well as an NAACP Spingarn Medal for his literary and cultural achievements. He traveled widely and wrote dozens of books before his death in 1967. He was a noted social activist with an interest in Communism and alternative systems of segregation. He was also a founder of the genre of jazz poetry, which began during the Harlem Renaissance and was continued and adapted by the Beats in the 1950s.

Kamila [148]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

In “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain,” a short essay published by The Nation in 1926, poet Langston Hughes writes about the importance of embracing black culture and the necessity for black artists and authors not to conform to a standardized (i.e. white) idea of artistic expression.

Hughes begins his essay with a quote from a poet he does not name, but which contextual details indicate may have been Hughes's contemporary Countee Cullen. Cullen says, essentially, that he wants to be known as a poet of merit, not as a “Negro poet.” Hughes is appalled by Cullen's statement, his denial of his skin color and heritage. He makes it clear in the first paragraph of the essay that this situation, in which the black artist strives for “standardization” and whiteness, is the racial mountain indicated in the title of the piece, which all African-American artists fight to climb.

Hughes analyzes the background of the young poet he quotes. He talks about how the poet was most likely striving toward whiteness because of his upbringing – his parents both worked for rich white people, and he came from a comfortable, middle-class, church-going family. He also attended an unsegregated school, one of few in the region where he was raised, which may have contributed to his rejection of his heritage. Hughes writes that because of his upbringing, this poet was never taught the beauty and value of his own heritage, only the beauty and value of whiteness.

Hughes continues on to describe the differences between “high-class” and the more common African-American homes. These high-class homes he describes are notably whitewashed. He depicts a family with a well-educated father and a light-skinned mother with a job in the service industry, or no job at all. The focus of the family is on the church and material objects. On the other side of the coin, Hughes notes, the majority of black families live a different kind of life. Hughes describes the joy and playfulness of neighborhoods full of jazz music, drinking, and dancing in Washington and Chicago. These places are livelier, less reserved, and proud of their culture and their heritage. Hughes makes it clear that in these neighborhoods, black people are not rejecting a white way of life. Rather, they are living the life they choose to live, one that feels joyful to them, without caring what white people think of it. Hughes makes it clear that he is thankful that there are more of these kinds of African-American homes, where there is pride in black heritage and culture.

Hughes then begins to discuss more explicitly his hatred of standardization and how he feels it impedes upon black voices. This is done, he argues, through American culture and education. Children of all races are taught that certain aspects of culture are more valuable than others and that there are certain parameters for what should be expressed, taught, or exhibited. Though Hughes makes it clear that historically, these valued expressions were made primarily by white men, he acknowledges that the U.S. of the 1920s is experiencing a cultural moment that values black art and black writing. Rather than allowing black artists to disappear from the spotlight only weeks after producing their work, if they are known at all, Hughes notes that in contemporary America it is hip to enjoy black music, art, and writing. This, he thinks, is also dangerous. He expresses his concerns about how black art catering to white interests could dilute the uniqueness of the artist that made them popular to begin with.

Hughes finishes his essay with a distinct note about why he writes about black issues. He makes it clear that he believes that every issue in America is a racial issue and that to write otherwise is to deny one’s own heritage and reject one’s family's legacy and history. Hughes suggests that choosing not to write from the perspective of the black experience as an African-American is the same as giving in to one standardized view of beauty and art.

Hughes, one of America's most famous poets, was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship as well as an NAACP Spingarn Medal for his literary and cultural achievements. He traveled widely and wrote dozens of books before his death in 1967. He was a noted social activist with an interest in Communism and alternative systems of segregation. He was also a founder of the genre of jazz poetry, which began during the Harlem Renaissance and was continued and adapted by the Beats in the 1950s

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the predicate noun?
zloy xaker [14]
Her renames Hope because Hope is in the subject and her renames Hope
3 0
2 years ago
Why was Mr. Hendricks arrested?
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

He sat in the front section of a bus.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Please Help Me Right Now (Right answer only i have 1 shot 2 take this quiz )
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

its the second one i done this before

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the passengers most likely overcome by the sight?
Katarina [22]

Answer:

THE ANSWER SHOULD BE A

Explanation:

I'm not really sure with the amount of info you gave me but that should be it.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
While wandering through the streets of a foreign city for the first time, Maurice experienced a strange sense of familiarity wit
STatiana [176]

Answer:

Déjà vu

Explanation:

Déjà vu is a French word that literally means "already seen." People who experience Déjà vu usually get a momentarily weird feeling of being familiar with something that they ought not to be familiar with. Indeed, they ought not to be familiar with that thing because it is actually their first time being in the location, situation or event.

The feeling is not different from Maurice's case because he is visiting a foreign city for the first time but somehow momentarily experience a weird feeling of being familiar with the city's landscapes which is actually foreign to him.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Persuasive speaking must include which of the following?
    6·2 answers
  • Among what class of workers does johnson place writers of dictionaries
    9·2 answers
  • Using a thesaurus, look up the verb throw, then find two of its synonyms in the list of words below.
    14·2 answers
  • Identify the context clue that helps you understand the meaning of the underlined word. The runner lacked the endurance and stam
    10·1 answer
  • Looking at information set off by commas that might state what the definition is for the unknown word is an example of which con
    14·1 answer
  • • f r e e • // • p o i n t s •
    8·1 answer
  • Select the piece of evidence that best supports this claim.
    12·2 answers
  • Where should a colon be placed to punctuate this sentence correctly?
    8·2 answers
  • Look at the underlined pronoun
    9·1 answer
  • Wright a essay are electric cars better than gas cars for the environment
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!