Hi
The term lack of genetic diversity for a particular population refers to the fact that there are less number of alleles and less range of phenotypes and traits like (height, skin, color, ability to cope disease, ability to change metabolism as per requirement etc).
If we talk about endangered species, they are the specie which are prone to be extinct in near future because their population is very less in number. There can be multiple reason of becoming endangered for a population such as over hunting etc.
So when we say that an endangered population is genetically less diverse, it means that there are further difficulties that hinder their recovery.
For example: If a calamity stucks, all organisms that are already low in number and also genetically less diverse, so they cannot cope with calamity and get extinct. However, if this population is genetically more diverse, some organisms may survive some may die, and those which survive can recover the population. That is why it becomes more difficult to recover an endangered specie if it is genetically less diverse. The more the genetic diversity, better it is for specie.
Hope it help!
Brainstorm, draft, reread, revise, edit, final draft.
Conclusions should have a hook, bridge, and call to action and/or summary.
I believe its East to West :)
This is because Earth's rotation generates what is known as the Coriolis effect. This effect makes wind systems twist counter-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere.
the major difference between the position of producers and primary consumers in the food chain-
Primary consumers make up the second level of the food chain, while producers make up the third level of the food chain.
Primary consumers make up the last level of the food chain, while producers make up the first level of the food chain.
Primary consumers make up the first level of the food chain, while producers make up the last level of the food chain.
Primary consumers make up the second level of the food chain, while producers make up the first level of the food chain.
To know more about ( producers ) visit- brainly.com/question/14616889
#SPJ9
Cell theory may not become a law of cells and there are many reasons to prove it and I have 4 reasons why.One is because the scientific community has never accepted cell theory as a law for many years . Another reason is cell theory is only describes the natural world and explains the natural world .My last reason is cell theory does not have enough support to be made into a law. Therefore, cell theory will never become the law of cells. Hope this helps :)
