Answer:
C. the starvation of up to 35 million people.
Explanation:
Collectivization was first introduced in the USSR by Joseph Stalin between 1929-1933 and his purpose for starting this process was to limit the powers of the Kulaks, who were the rich peasants. The program was also aimed at improving agriculture. China adopted this same policy under the rule of Mao Zedong between 1949-1976. Also known as <em>The Great Leap Forward </em>era, this process sought to make China a socialist economy and also increase productivity in agriculture.
The resultant effect of this process was mass starvation of about 35 million people in 1959. Although the government referred to floods and droughts as the cause of this starvation, it was actually the result of collectivization. When Diang Xiaping came into power in 1978, he instituted reforms in the collectivization process that proved successful.
People and procedures for assessing information needs, developing the needed information, and helping decision makers use the information. Hope it is helpful. Peace✌️
Answer:
12.78
Explanation:
Two stage dividend growth model enables us to identify dividend value by incorporating the effect of multiple growth rates. This model assumes that dividend will pass out through 2 stages of growth. In first stage the dividend grows at a constant rate to a specified time then dividend grows at a further rate.
= Do (1 + g) + D1 (1 +g) + D2 (1 +g) + D3 (1 +g) + D3 * (1 +g2) / (r - g2)
0.4 * 1.2 + 0.48 * 1.2 + 0.6 * 1.2 + 0.7 *1.2 + 0.83 * 1.03 / 11 - 3
= 12.78.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
because it makes sense in the sentence
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
