Two species of sea urchins live practically side-by-side in sandy bottoms. The two species appear to have the same diet: drift seaweeds and other bits of organic matter. They can live in the same environment without competing.
As it compels them to live in the same environmental surroundings so the characteristics of living nature also get developed as their current following situation that's helping them to get the same food & habitat.
<span>Notice a couple of things
different between (A) and (B). It was NOT the first time a biologist
proposed that species changed through time (so it's not B). But it
finally *solidified* that idea by giving "change through time"
(evolution) a MECHANISM. It gave a plausible explanation for WHY
species change over time, in a testable way that made sense and had
evidence to support it.
So it finally dismissed the idea that species are constant.
It also emphasized that the simple presence of *variation* within a population was a key reason for evolution.
While we're at it ... (C) is wrong because it's not *individuals* that
acclimate (adapt) to their environment, but the population (the species)
as a whole.
And (D) is wrong because it had nothing to do with economics or the monarchy.</span>
Answer:
Archaea
Explanation:
Most extremophiles are microorganisms (and a high proportion of these are archaea), but this group also includes eukaryotes such as protists (e.g., algae, fungi and protozoa) and multicellular organisms. Archaea is the main group to thrive in extreme environments.
Genetic diseases is one of the topics that will be covered in biology
