Catholicism became the leading religion in the area, which led to many wars.
In my opinion, the unique American nationality developed a great deal during the 18th century. Of all things, the French and Indian War (the 1750's) probably had one the greater effects on the feeling of nationality. For the first time, the colonists felt a feeling of military success. This undoubtedly fueled a sense of unity. Moreover, Enlightenment thinkers like Benjamin Franklin contributed to the "new" American culture. His developments as an American were unique and stimulating.
I think that regional differences in the colonies continued to grow and grow until the outbreak of the Civil War in 1860. The South was able to grow a different and wider variety of things, thus creating its own economic identity (slavery, etc). The North remained more religious-affiliated and began to develop things like more universities, which the south generally did not (not a single ivy-league college in the south). A very different ideology continued to create each colony own identity in the 18th century and continued for quite some time.
Answer:
Muckraker, any of a group of American writers identified with pre-World War I reform and exposé literature. The muckrakers provided detailed, accurate journalistic accounts of the political and economic corruption and social hardships caused by the power of big business in a rapidly industrializing United States.
Explanation:
Election of public officials best exemplifies John Locke’s principle of consent of the governed.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Consent refers to the freedom of natural and legal rights. John Locke was a great philosopher of all time and especially famous for his work doctrine of rights. Locke claimed that men are free and they have the right to do their own actions without depending on the will of other men. But in the case of government, people will come to power and they cannot live without the will of the government.
So he argued the fact which the government can be officially legal only when the people decide them to be legitimate. Not every person will have the same consent about the government they are living under. Because of the benefits they experienced from the government. so he called this as tacit consent.
