1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stealth61 [152]
3 years ago
12

Why did Japan want Korea?​

History
2 answers:
e-lub [12.9K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Korea had natural resources that Japan lacked.

emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

In order to establish control over its new protectorate, the Empire of Japan waged an all-out war on Korean culture. Schools and universities forbade speaking Korean and emphasized manual labor and loyalty to the Emperor. ... During the occupation, Japan took over Korea's labor and land.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When the western allies created west germany as a nation in 1948, how did the soviet union respond?
denis23 [38]
When West Germany was created the Soviet Union established a blockade at West Berlin.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I shall ask the congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis -- broad executive power to wage a war against the
ExtremeBDS [4]

This quote illustrates the role of a Commander-in-chief. When the country is invaded or attacked, the president has powers to take <em>critical decisions</em> to deal with the  imminent conflict. In the case of  any crisis, the president is requesting the congress for <em>similar executive powers</em> in order to wage a war agaisnt the emergency, as if it were a real war.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
4 years ago
What was the difference between the Explorers of Portugal and Explorers of spain
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

The Spanish were motivated by a desire for gold

Explanation:

The gold was used by the Spanish monarchy to pay off its debts and also to fund its 'religious' wars. Therefore, gold started to trickle out to other European countries who benefited from the Spanish wealth

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were messages sent by telegraph?
pochemuha
Messages were sent by an electrical telegraph operator or telegrapher using Morse code.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Help please
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not characteristic of a communist system?
    7·1 answer
  • In this political cartoon from 1948, Stalin and Truman are engaged in a game of chess. Stalin’s pieces represent the Berlin Bloc
    6·2 answers
  • How was the idea of Christendom instrumental in improving Charlemagne's reign?
    10·1 answer
  • The Greek and Roman Empires took part in a period of conquests What were the results?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Virginia Charter important? A. It outlawed slavery in Virginia. B. It set the boundary between Virginia and Maryland
    6·1 answer
  • When did the war change from a battle over preserving the union to a war to end slavery
    10·1 answer
  • Please help ill mark brainylist!!!
    10·1 answer
  • An illustrated poster shows a man, woman, and young working in a garden and harvesting vegetables. The text reads Plant a Victor
    14·1 answer
  • 1. What is the Concert of Europe? How was it changed after the Crimean War?<br> li
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!