Which best explains the economic benefits of building a smaller courthouse instead of a larger one?

2 answers:

8 0

The statement that best explains the economic benefits of building a smaller courthouse instead of a larger one is that a smaller courthouse would require fewer workers and materials to build it and could also open more quickly compared to a larger one. Hope this helps!

Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is:

A. A smaller courthouse would require fewer workers and materials and could open more quickly.

This best explains the economic benefits of building a smaller courthouse instead of a larger one.

$|Huntrw6|$

You might be interested in

Which of these is not one of the goals listed in the preamble to the u.s. constitution?

VikaD [51]

The answer might be a. depending on the place

8 0

4 years ago

In which system of government would states function independently of each other

Sonbull [250]

The answer is Confederal

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which group best expresses Southerners' views of northerner's

denis-greek [22]

<span>Northerners were in favour of abolition of slavery while Southerners' were against this point of view. The group that best expresses ...</span><span>
</span>

3 0

4 years ago

Henry Cabot Lodge supported which of the following policies?

algol [13]

Answer: imperialist policies

Explanation:

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The questions are posted.

-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

1. d) There was a lack of evidence that the students ' actions disrupted learning.

2. c) Students have fewer privacy rights in school than in other public settings.

3. d) Brianna's 1st Amendment rights (freedom of speech) were violated, and her actions did not cause any disruptions to the day-to-day functioning of the school.

4. c) New Jersey v. T.L.O.

5. a) Bell's recording provided grounds for a substantial disruption and interference with normal school activities.

Explanation:

The court ruled that the school administration's search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook in this instance did not violate the 4th Amendment. The fourth amendment applies to everyone in the school, including the administrators.
On June 25, 2009, the Supreme Court upheld, reversed, and remanded. In a judgement made by the court in the 4th amendment case of New Jersey v. T. L. O., the Court decided that the search did not meet the "reasonable suspicion" requirement for searches of kids in a school context.
Due to the policy's vagueness and potential for discriminatory application, the court found it illegal. The court also said that Brianna's 1st Amendment rights had been violated because her actions didn't change how the school normally ran.

6 0

3 years ago