Which best explains the economic benefits of building a smaller courthouse instead of a larger one?

2 answers:

8 0

The statement that best explains the economic benefits of building a smaller courthouse instead of a larger one is that a smaller courthouse would require fewer workers and materials to build it and could also open more quickly compared to a larger one. Hope this helps!

Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is:

A. A smaller courthouse would require fewer workers and materials and could open more quickly.

This best explains the economic benefits of building a smaller courthouse instead of a larger one.

$|Huntrw6|$

You might be interested in

What was true of japanese americans in the west during world war ii apex?

sweet [91]

During World War II, many Japanese-Americans were sent into internment camps thanks to Executive Order 9066.

After the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese military, many members of the government and US citizens in general were paranoid that there would be another attack on America by the Japanese. To ensure that this attack did not happen, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066. This allowed for the removal of individuals from military areas. After this, internment camps were formed for Japanese-American citizens.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did expansionism change the United States role in the world

nikdorinn [45]

It played a big role in the united states so that would be the correct answer and yes you do it all good morning you don’t want me anything else i was the

6 0

3 years ago

15. What did Marco Polo inspire?

garri49 [273]

C. (i’m pretty sure)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been redistricted.

Ugo [173]

Taking into account the statement above: "Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been redistricted.

Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?