I feel like it would depend.
If the U.S weren’t involved in foreign affairs, the U.S wouldn’t be easily blamed for something.
We would be considered “innocent” in a way to the worlds eyes
Which is a good profile for a place to have
So, if it were to create a profit for the U.S then I believe we should not get involved in other countries affairs
I believe the answer is: <span>Michaela, who is inhibited and fearful
The characteristic of inhibited and fearful that displayed by small infants are most commonly caused by survival mechanism, which make the infant could only be comfortable in the environment that they're familiar with.
As they grow into 4 year olds group, their ability to perceive their surroundig would most likely be altered and the inhibted and fearful characteristic would start to diminish.</span>
Answer:
A. TRUE
Explanation:
Application : Application for the assistance of federal financial directly from the FEMA.
Subapplication : Application for assistance for the federal financial that is indirectly access through some pass-through entity. (Applicant to FEMA or Subapplicant to the Applicant)
Subapplicant : A state agency, territorial government, local government or any federally-recognized tribal government who submits a sub-application to an applicant for the assistance under the FEMA's hazard mitigation grant programs.
Yes it is true that an applicant user with access to submit or sign can submit as well as update, review the status, fill and can complete the applicant who is acting as the sub-applicant sub-application.
The factor that led to shifts in the supreme court decisions over time is that
- The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
<h3>
How the supreme court Justices became less liberal</h3>
The supreme court justices became less liberal due to the fact that a lot of these judges were conservatives.
The conservative judges were the ones that were in favor of keeping the ideals and the traditions that the country was built on.
<u>complete question:</u>
Which of the following factors most likely led to shifts in Supreme Court decision making over time?
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
After 1960, the Supreme Court deferred to the wishes of state and local governments rather than voting to expand the authority of the federal government.
Rather than pass new legislation, Congress was inclined to refer civil rights legislation to the Supreme Court.
Constitutional amendments enabled the Supreme Court to issue more liberal decisions.
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over
Read more on conservatives here:brainly.com/question/8668324
The correct answer is C) the Communist Party represented the working people and, therefore, was the only party with the right to govern
Of course, this was often taken advantage of due to people wanting to follow their personal agendas more.
