Answer:
was having/had
Explanation:
it depends on the context outside of it to. For example if you were telling a story and that was a detail it would be "was having" but any other context would be "had"
Through reading Malamud's story you can realize that, while Sobel loves to read, he doesn't believe much in education as a means to better his life. Feld is a strong believer of this, which he demonstrates with his actions and approach to work when he offers Sobel more money if he comes back to work with him. Therefore, your best answer is option C.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: What are the "tatters and charcoal ruins of history? would be: the books and any such written texts, that had by now been prohibited and were considered useless and even hateful. These were the ruins of written history and they were left in tatters because they were always burned.
Explanation:
"Farenheit 451" is the novel that was written by Ray Bradbury and which was published in 1953. The story narrates the life of Guy Montag, a firefighter who has to perform his duty, like everyone else, of exterminating literature and all other kinds of writting, that are present in books. In order to do this, Montag, and his colleagues go to different places where books might be present, and instead of putting out fires, fire them to burn books. In this particular excerpt, which is part of the very opening of the novel, the main character is talking about books themselves, and how they were seen as an evil thing that needed to be destroyed, as they were deemed useless. History, and knowledge, says the novel, was now given through other types of media.
False, microcosmic means that humans and the world are tiny compared to the vastness of the cosmic void known as the universe.
Answer:
The voting age in America should not be changed from 18 to 16. This is because there are many immature citizen teens out there who would not look further into detail about who they would vote for. Most would just pick based off of things they like about the person. They wouldn't look into further detail. And besides your not an adult until your 18 years of age or in the twenty age. Sixteen year old teens are smart yes, but still too young to be voting especially for something that could change everyone's lives. If you were to let an 16 year old be allowed to vote your life and the rest of the world rests in their hands basically. 18 year old teens are more mature about this topic and more aware of what needs to be done to vote for someone. They look into things and find out more about that person.
Explanation:
