Answer:
Social media is a big part of many young people’s social and creative lives. Social media is becoming increasingly embedded in apps, games, websites and even learning environments, so it’s hard to ban, even for younger children. And if you ban social media, your child might be more tempted to check it out when they’re away from home. This means you miss the opportunity to teach your child how to navigate social media risks and behave respectfully on social media.
Children and teenagers use social media to have fun, make and maintain friendships, share interests, explore identities and develop relationships with family. It’s an extension of their offline and face-to-face interactions. For older teenagers especially, it’s often a key part of how they connect with friends.
Social media can connect children and teenagers to online global communities based on shared interests. These might be support networks – for example, for young people with disability or medical conditions, teenagers, or children from particular cultural backgrounds. Or they might be sites for commenting on and sharing content about particular interests like games, TV series, music or hobbies.
On the other hand,in order to keep your teen kid safe, try by blocking and reporting people they don’t know or people who post upsetting comments or content.
Explanation:
Strategic thinking can consist of something as simple as how to buy groceries so that one uses one's weekly budget to determine what to buy and buy food that while healthy is also going to last several meals so o it can involve buying lots of vegetables which are relatively cheap to mix with a little meat and then cook it in the slow cooker overnight so basically it cooks itself. This then can be considered a rational way of buying and cooking groceries to save money, eat healthy and cook easily.
I think the supporting material in this speech is poor. The student gives a lot of information about statistics, which is very helpful, but doesn't give details about which organisms studied the topic. Where did the student found these statistics? Who did them? Are they specialized in the subject?
The student mentions the doctors by saying "many doctors". Who are these doctors, which are their names, which are their specialties?
The student after says that there are "<em>other institutions</em>" that suggest that a child whose body weight is at least 20% higher than a child of a similar height is obese. Which are these "<em>other institutions</em>"?
Then, the student takes the discussed issue a little lightly when saying "<em>No matter what the exact definition</em>" after saying how complicated this illness is. Does the student think it is not important to know the exacts definition? If not, who says that?
I think this speech has to have probationary documentation. All these facts and statics mentioned don't have support. The student doesn't name even one of the organizations, doctors, authorities specialized in the subject he or she is referring to.
It is a very serious topic, about a serious disease, and has to be addressed with consciousness. If not, it seems like everything is the student's opinion and we know what he or she is saying is probably true. The student has to name every document he or she read in order to give this information.
