1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Effectus [21]
3 years ago
15

Settlers and tribes both had effects on each other. On many trails headed west, settlers traveled in fear of attack from tribes

who would rob or kill members of caravans. Tribes would attack stagecoaches and wagons that traveled across their lands. On the other hand, settlers constantly encroached on tribes' lands.
History
1 answer:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include the question. Here we just have a statement.

If it is a "true" or "false" question, then the correct answer is "true."

If you need a commentary, here it is.

White American settlers who traveled to the west met fierce opposition from the Native American Natives of the region. The Native American Indians thought that those lands were theirs. The land belonged to them and had been inherited by their ancestors. That is why they defended their territories.

On the other hand, white settlers were interested in occupying those territories to settle in and exploit the many natural resources and raw materials of the region.

So as your statement reads, settlers and tribes both had effects on each other. On many trails headed west, settlers traveled in fear of attack from tribes who would rob or kill members of caravans. Tribes would attack stagecoaches and wagons that traveled across their lands. On the other hand, settlers constantly encroached on tribes' lands.

You might be interested in
How has the economic impact of environmental concerns effected the U.S.?
larisa [96]

Answer:

In part, this balanced approach was likely motivated by the significant slowdown in U.S. productivity growth, uptick in inflation, and, by the mid-1970s, doubling of the unemployment rate that coincided with the expansion of federal oversight into areas such as environmental quality. 2 To better understand the potential effects of environmental regulation on the economy several government reports were commissioned to investigate the potential impacts on a wide array of measures, including national economic growth, industries and firms, employment, and consumers (e.g., U.S. CEQ, 1971).

Explanation:

brainly me

8 0
3 years ago
What were the two factors that helped the scientific revolution spread to europe
lina2011 [118]
The two factors lol :(
4 0
3 years ago
How does Falwell see as the major threat to moral standards in 1970's America?
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

The television was a major threat to moral standards. It made the youth lose respect to human life.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following characteristics of a multipolar world?
Rina8888 [55]

  ∵∴∵answer∵∴∵

clothing made in a multitude of countries competing with the US

formation of the European Union

China and India becoming superpowers

∵∴∵description∵∴∵

A Multipolar World would mean the various differences in thoughts and ideas regarding anything in particular which different people across the world might be having. It can also be used to signify the various lines on which the populace of the world can be divided regarding one single topic.

“A multipolar world of diversity and creativity among cultures, nations, and economies—is the world we believe we can build, one that will enrich our lives, and thrives on habits of peace and creative competition,”-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright

           

              /:\

            ///;:.. \

  __--"////;:... \"--__

--__   "--_____--"   __-- Hope this helps -Tom

   """--_______--"""

7 0
3 years ago
Describe at least two society developments and changes in the early 20th century in the United States and how they impacted drug
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Describe at least two society developments and changes in the early 20th century in the United States:

1. The Harrison Act.

2. The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937

and how they impacted drug use:

Trends in federal drug enforcement may reflect changes in the nation’s drug problems and  changes in the federal response to these problems. These trends also may reflect the federal  government’s enforcement priorities, but the drug use in steadily increasing.

Explanation:

1. The Harrison Act:

In response to growing  levels of drug abuse, federal control of drugs began to take shape in the early 20th century, the federal government aimed to regulate and control drugs through  taxation. The Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914 (Harrison Act; P.L. 63-223), required importers, manufacturers, and distributors of cocaine and opium to register with the U.S., among other regulations.

2. The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 :

During the 1920s, narcotic enforcement was closely tied to Prohibition enforcement. In 1930,  Prohibition enforcement was transferred to the Department of Justice while a standalone federal  agency, the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN), was established within the Treasury to handle  narcotic enforcement. During Prohibition, a new recreational drug—marijuana—had quickly  become unpopular with law enforcement, especially in the southwestern United States. As  Prohibition ended, marijuana caught the attention of Congress and the FBN.  Until 1937, the growth and use of marijuana was legal under federal law. During the course of  promoting federal legislation to control marijuana, Henry Anslinger, the first commissioner of the  FBN, and others submitted testimony to Congress regarding the evils of marijuana use, claiming  that it incited violent and insane behavior. Commissioner Anslinger had informed  Congress that “the major criminal in the United States is the drug addict; that of all the offenses  committed against the laws of this country, the narcotic addict is the most frequent offender."

Although all these, the number of drug  cases filed by U.S. Attorneys increased in the late 1990s and early 2000s. While this may  reflect a higher drug crime incidence rate, it also may reflect a federal enforcement focus on drug  crimes.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After the American revolution why did other nations look to the United States as a model
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes confirmation bias?
    15·2 answers
  • Booker T. Washington believed that the best strategy to end racial segregation was for African Americans to
    13·2 answers
  • 2. Why was Emperor Qin considered a great leader?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the great deppression affect women?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Martin Luther King decide that poverty and the War in Vietnam were civil rights issues?
    8·1 answer
  • What was an outcome of the wars for independence in latin america?
    10·2 answers
  • That they are endowed by their Creator with
    9·1 answer
  • Why did King Henry VIII start the Church of England?
    10·1 answer
  • who played the role in the battle of the alamo by reinforcing the mission with 300 men before he returned to Goliad​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!