Answer:
All accounts and their balances at a particular date
Explanation:
The trial balance is the total of the all accounts belong to the income statement, retained earnings, balance sheet. Also their debit and credit balance are totalled and equalled to each other
So as per the given options, all other options except the above one are wrong as it represent to the particular statement i.e. totally incorrect
Therefore the above represent the answer
For many things identity theft, to be treated as if they don’t know as much etc
Answer:
Option C Incorrect; adjusting for price changes, his salary is less than his dad's salary
Explanation:
Adjustment to price changes = (Amount received n years ago divided by Price Index n years ago) * Price Index today
Adjustment To price changes = ($28,000 / 110.8) * 180.5 = $45613.7
The amount $28,000 is worth $45,613.7 in todays value which means that if we adjust for price changes, Dave is incorrect because his salary is worth less by an amount $613.7 from his father's salary.
Answer:
$5,641
Explanation:
DEPOSIT NOW
$1000 * FVIF 9%,8 PERIODS
= $1000 * 1.9926
= $1992.6
IN 2 YEARS
= $2000 * FVIF 9%,6 PERIODS
= $2000 * 1.6771
= $3354.20
IN 5 YEARS
= $8000 * FVIF 9%, 3 PERIODS
= $8000*1.2950
= $10360
WITHDRAWAL: IN 3 YEARS
= ($3000) * FVIF 9%, 5 PERIODS
= ($3000) * 1.5386
= ($4615.80)
IN 7 YEARS
= ($5000) * FVIF 9%, 1 PERIOD
= ($5000) * 1.0900
= ($5450)
Total value = $1992.6 + $3354.20 + $10360 - $4615.80 - $5450
Total value = $5,641
So, the total future value after eight years is $5,641
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Choices that are the best for more than one person are said to be in the social interest.
Explanation:
The social interest is a concept sufficiently clarified in Company Law. The Capital Companies Law refers to it in terms of challenging social agreements: if an agreement is not in accordance with the corporate interest, it can be challenged. It is only negatively contested, that is, if the plaintiff can argue that the agreement is contrary to the social interest, so that it is not a validity requirement that the agreement be in accordance with the social interest. Likewise, if the administrators act against the social interest when they exercise their discretionary powers, they incur responsibility for violation of their duty of loyalty.
